Skip to contents

Introduction

A spatially stratified creel survey divides the lake into discrete geographic sections — for example, North, Central, and South — each managed as a separate reporting unit. Each section has its own observed count data and its own set of angler interviews, so effort levels and catch rates can differ materially between sections.

add_sections() is the right tool when the survey design explicitly stratifies by section: when different field crews patrol different areas, when section-level estimates are required in the final report, or when the lake is large enough that assuming uniform effort across the full water body would be misleading. If you are simply curious about spatial patterns but did not design the survey with sections in mind, use the standard creel_design() workflow without add_sections().


Building a Sectioned Design

library(tidycreel)

data(example_sections_calendar)
data(example_sections_counts)
data(example_sections_interviews)

sections_df <- data.frame(
  section = c("North", "Central", "South"),
  stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)

design <- creel_design(example_sections_calendar, date = date, strata = day_type)
design <- add_sections(design, sections_df, section_col = section)
design <- add_counts(design, example_sections_counts)
design <- add_interviews(
  design, example_sections_interviews,
  catch = catch_total,
  effort = hours_fished,
  harvest = catch_kept,
  trip_status = trip_status,
  trip_duration = trip_duration
)
#>  No `n_anglers` provided — assuming 1 angler per interview.
#>  Pass `n_anglers = <column>` to use actual party sizes for angler-hour
#>   normalization.
#>  Added 27 interviews: 27 complete (100%), 0 incomplete (0%)
print(design)
#> 
#> ── Creel Survey Design ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Type: "instantaneous"
#> Date column: date
#> Strata: day_type
#> Calendar: 12 days (2024-06-03 to 2024-06-21)
#> day_type: 2 levels
#> Counts: 36 observations
#> PSU column: date
#> Count type: "instantaneous"
#> Survey: <survey.design2> (constructed)
#> Interviews: 27 observations
#> Type: "access"
#> Catch: catch_total
#> Effort: hours_fished
#> Harvest: catch_kept
#> Trip status: 27 complete, 0 incomplete
#> Survey: <survey.design2> (constructed)
#> Sections: 3 registered
#> North
#> Central
#> South

The design now shows three registered sections (North, Central, South). All downstream estimators automatically detect sections and return per-section output.


Per-Section Effort Estimation

estimate_effort() detects the registered sections and returns one row per section plus a .lake_total row that aggregates across sections. The lake-total standard error accounts for cross-section covariance (described in the Variance Aggregation section below).

effort_est <- estimate_effort(design)
print(effort_est$estimates)
#> # A tibble: 4 × 10
#>   section     estimate    se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper     n
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>      <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>
#> 1 North            269 12.3       12.3          0    242.      296.    12
#> 2 Central          472 19.0       19.0          0    430.      514.    12
#> 3 South            105  9.18       9.18         0     84.6     125.    12
#> 4 .lake_total      846 39.4       NA           NA    758.      934.    36
#> # ℹ 2 more variables: prop_of_lake_total <dbl>, data_available <lgl>

Central has the highest fishing effort among the three sections, while South has the lowest. The prop_of_lake_total column shows each section’s share of total angler-hours for the survey period.


Per-Section Catch Rate

Catch rate (CPUE, fish per angler-hour) is a ratio estimator. Ratios are not additive across sections: you cannot average North’s rate and South’s rate to produce a valid lake-wide CPUE. For this reason, estimate_catch_rate() on a sectioned design returns one row per section with no .lake_total row.

cpue_est <- estimate_catch_rate(design)
#>  Using complete trips for CPUE estimation
#>   (n=27, 100% of 27 interviews) [default]
print(cpue_est$estimates)
#> # A tibble: 3 × 7
#>   section estimate     se ci_lower ci_upper     n data_available
#>   <chr>      <dbl>  <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int> <lgl>         
#> 1 North       1.06 0.0710    0.922     1.20     9 TRUE          
#> 2 Central     1.51 0.0179    1.47      1.54     9 TRUE          
#> 3 South       2.45 0.0287    2.39      2.51     9 TRUE

Notice there is no .lake_total row. Catch rate is a ratio estimator and ratios are not additive — South’s high catch rate cannot simply be averaged with North’s low rate to produce a valid lake-wide CPUE. To estimate the lake-wide catch rate, call estimate_catch_rate() on a design without section registration.

# Lake-wide catch rate: build an unsectioned design using the same data
design_nosections <- creel_design(example_sections_calendar, date = date, strata = day_type)
design_nosections <- add_counts(design_nosections, example_sections_counts)
design_nosections <- add_interviews(
  design_nosections, example_sections_interviews,
  catch = catch_total, effort = hours_fished,
  harvest = catch_kept, trip_status = trip_status, trip_duration = trip_duration
)
#>  No `n_anglers` provided — assuming 1 angler per interview.
#>  Pass `n_anglers = <column>` to use actual party sizes for angler-hour
#>   normalization.
#>  Added 27 interviews: 27 complete (100%), 0 incomplete (0%)
estimate_catch_rate(design_nosections)$estimates
#>  Using complete trips for CPUE estimation
#>   (n=27, 100% of 27 interviews) [default]
#> # A tibble: 1 × 5
#>   estimate    se ci_lower ci_upper     n
#>      <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>
#> 1     1.77 0.118     1.54     2.00    27

Per-Section and Lake-Wide Total Catch

Total catch combines effort and catch rate within each section: TC_i = E_i × CPUE_i. The lake-wide total is sum(TC_i)not E_total × CPUE_pooled. With aggregate_sections = TRUE (the default), a .lake_total row is appended to the output.

catch_est <- estimate_total_catch(design, aggregate_sections = TRUE)
print(catch_est$estimates)
#> # A tibble: 4 × 8
#>   section     estimate    se ci_lower ci_upper     n prop_of_lake_total
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>              <dbl>
#> 1 North           285.  23.1     240.     331.     9              0.228
#> 2 Central         711.  29.9     653.     770.     9              0.567
#> 3 South           257.  22.7     213.     302.     9              0.205
#> 4 .lake_total    1254.  44.1    1156.    1352.     3              1    
#> # ℹ 1 more variable: data_available <lgl>

South has a high catch rate but the lowest effort, which limits its contribution to the lake total. Central has a moderate catch rate combined with the highest effort, making it the largest contributor. The prop_of_lake_total column shows each section’s percentage contribution to the lake-wide total catch.

harvest_est <- estimate_total_harvest(design, aggregate_sections = TRUE)
print(harvest_est$estimates)
#> # A tibble: 4 × 8
#>   section     estimate    se ci_lower ci_upper     n prop_of_lake_total
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>              <dbl>
#> 1 North           165.  15.8     134.     196.     9              0.204
#> 2 Central         466.  23.8     419.     512.     9              0.576
#> 3 South           178.  15.9     147.     210.     9              0.221
#> 4 .lake_total     809.  32.7     736.     882.     3              1    
#> # ℹ 1 more variable: data_available <lgl>

Variance Aggregation — Why method = "correlated" Is the Default

In a standard shared-calendar creel design, the field crew works the entire lake on each survey day. Every section is counted and interviewed on the same calendar days: if a day is sampled, all three sections are observed; if a day is not sampled, none are.

Sharing survey days creates cross-section covariance in the sampling errors. In practice this covariance tends to be negative: on high-effort days all sections run high together, and on low-effort days they run low together. The shared-calendar variance formula accounts for this covariance and produces a narrower lake-total standard error than simply adding the section standard errors in quadrature.

method = "independent" is appropriate only when sections are surveyed by separate, uncoordinated crews — for example, when the South section is run by Crew A on different days from the North section (Crew B). In that case the sections have truly independent sampling errors and Cochran (1977, §5.2) additivity applies: SE_total = sqrt(sum(SE_h^2)).

Rule of thumb: If your crew drives the entire lake on each survey day, use the default method = "correlated". If different sections have separate, non-overlapping calendars, use method = "independent".

# Default: accounts for cross-section covariance (shared-calendar designs)
estimate_effort(design, method = "correlated")$estimates
#> # A tibble: 4 × 10
#>   section     estimate    se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper     n
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>      <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>
#> 1 North            269 12.3       12.3          0    242.      296.    12
#> 2 Central          472 19.0       19.0          0    430.      514.    12
#> 3 South            105  9.18       9.18         0     84.6     125.    12
#> 4 .lake_total      846 39.4       NA           NA    758.      934.    36
#> # ℹ 2 more variables: prop_of_lake_total <dbl>, data_available <lgl>

# Alternative: Cochran 5.2 additivity (independent crews, non-overlapping calendars)
estimate_effort(design, method = "independent")$estimates
#> # A tibble: 4 × 10
#>   section     estimate    se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper     n
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>      <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>
#> 1 North            269 12.3       12.3          0    242.      296.    12
#> 2 Central          472 19.0       19.0          0    430.      514.    12
#> 3 South            105  9.18       9.18         0     84.6     125.    12
#> 4 .lake_total      846 24.4       NA           NA    792.      900.    36
#> # ℹ 2 more variables: prop_of_lake_total <dbl>, data_available <lgl>

Missing Section Warning

If a registered section has no count data on any survey day, estimate_effort() produces an NA row with data_available = FALSE and emits a warning. This prevents silent omission of sections that should have been observed.

north_central_counts <- example_sections_counts[
  example_sections_counts$section != "South",
]

design_missing <- creel_design(example_sections_calendar, date = date, strata = day_type)
design_missing <- add_sections(design_missing, sections_df, section_col = section)
design_missing <- suppressWarnings(add_counts(design_missing, north_central_counts))

estimate_effort(design_missing, missing_sections = "warn")$estimates
#> Warning: 1 missing section(s) in count data.
#> ! Section(s) not found: "South"
#>  Inserting NA row(s) with data_available = FALSE.
#> # A tibble: 4 × 10
#>   section     estimate    se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper     n
#>   <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>      <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl>    <dbl> <int>
#> 1 North            269  12.3       12.3         0     242.     296.    12
#> 2 Central          472  19.0       19.0         0     430.     514.    12
#> 3 South             NA  NA         NA          NA      NA       NA      0
#> 4 .lake_total      741  31.1       NA          NA     672.     810.    24
#> # ℹ 2 more variables: prop_of_lake_total <dbl>, data_available <lgl>

To turn warnings into errors (for automated pipelines), use missing_sections = "error".